Subject: Re: Old DOS program (shareware / freeware?)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C20BC8.1C5DA8A0"
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C20BC8.1C5DA8A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
I don't have any DOS programs that created organization charts from
outlines, but I remember that Aldus had a product for Windows that could
work like that. Was it Persuasion? It's been years.
Maybe your search for the DOS program would work better with these terms.
Organagram is unfamiliar to me.
Alan Striegel
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel R [mailto:nigel@KEEPSMILING.CO.ZA]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:59 AM
>I require an application that will convert an outlined text file i.e. each
>level indented by a tab or space etc. into a organagram / hierarchy chart.
>Many years ago (4.7 Mhz processor and DOS ver 2 era!) I had such a program
>and after searching through several hundred 51/4 floppies have not been
able
>to locate
...
> I have conducted an
>Internet search using key words such as chart / organagram / dos / outline
>but unfortunately have found nothing... Can anyone on this list help? The
>output from the program I remember using was limited to 15 or so characters
>per line enclosed in simple box's created using ASCII elements with the
>input being a plain text file.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C20BC8.1C5DA8A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
RE: Old DOS program (shareware / freeware?)
I don't have any DOS programs that created =
organization charts from outlines, but I remember that Aldus had a =
product for Windows that could work like that. Was it =
Persuasion? It's been years.
Maybe your search for the DOS program would work =
better with these terms. Organagram is unfamiliar to me.
Alan Striegel
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel R [mailto:nigel@KEEPSMILING.CO.ZA=
A>]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:59 AM
>I require an application that will convert an =
outlined text file i.e. each
>level indented by a tab or space etc. into a =
organagram / hierarchy chart.
>Many years ago (4.7 Mhz processor and DOS ver 2 =
era!) I had such a program
>and after searching through several hundred 51/4 =
floppies have not been able
>to locate
...
> I have conducted an
>Internet search using key words such as chart / =
organagram / dos / outline
>but unfortunately have found nothing... Can =
anyone on this list help? The
>output from the program I remember using was =
limited to 15 or so characters
>per line enclosed in simple box's created using =
ASCII elements with the
>input being a plain text file.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C20BC8.1C5DA8A0--
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:36:59 +0200
Reply-To: furlan@gmx.net
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Dr. Werner Furlan"
Organization: OE9FWV
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable
Victor Roberts schrieb =FCber Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus:
> Why do you believe that Outlook or OE
> are fundamentally any more prone to
> virus attack than any other Win mailer
> that displays HTML and _allows_ users
> to open attachments? It has been my
> understanding that Outlook and OE are
> targets of virus attacks _only_
> because they are by far the most
> popular mailers for Win systems.If you
> have evidence to the contrary, please
> post it because I am always ready to
> learn more.
>=20
I am a long time user of Pegasus Mail and the programmer Mr. Harris=20
has spent much effort to prevent the users of his program against=20
viruses.
It is a fact that if you execute a file containing a virus you are=20
infected.=20
The same is true with potential malignant code in Internet=20
contents.=20
It may be less comfortable to lock the door, but it makes it also=20
less comfortable for the intruder.
you have the choice....
Werner=20
-- =20
PGP-Key:
SMS: <+436646340014@text.mobilkom.at>
Powered by Pegasus Mail - free at
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:31:45 +0200
Reply-To: Etienne Lemaire
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Etienne Lemaire
Subject: Ericsson t39 - DRS-11 - 200lx
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I've been using this combo for a few months now, with
Goin'Postal. It all works great!
However, the connectivity cable, null modem and Ericsson's DRS11
cable are a bit bulky.
Is there a way to cut the ends, and connect the cables in the
correct way?
I suppose I could do away with the null modem by rewiring the
connectivity cable (there's no electronics in there AFAIK) , but
can I link the Ericsson wires direct to the connectivity cable,
doing away with the connectors altogether, or is there some
circuitry in Ericsson's connector?
TIA
Etienne
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 09:43:57 -0500
Reply-To: Barry
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Barry
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
Comments: To: Don Miller
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Miller"
To:
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:21 PM
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
> Being a "big target" is only part of the problem. Outlook also
has some
> unfortunate design features that virus writers often exploit,
that allow
> viruses to infect computers automatically, even if the user
never opens
> the attachment - messages crafted to look like "inline"
objects, certain
> mime headers, etc. It tries to be more automated (and hide
more from the
> user) than most e-mail programs, and the viruses exploit that.
>
> Additionally, it uses the Windows Address Book, which is
particularly easy
> for viruses to exploit to get addresses. And rather than
keeping its
> settings, such as defined SMTP servers, in a separate INI
file, it puts
> them into the registry in a predictable place, so the virus
has an easy
> time figuring out how to route its messages. Like most current
MS stuff,
> it tries to pretend it's part of the operating system, not
just an
> application. So I would have to agree with the message you
were responding
> to, Outlook IS much worse than others...
>
> One other point of note: In my opinion, Outlook / OE are so
popular
> because they are bundled with virtually all new machines, and
many
> Microsoft programs - in my view, they get used because they
are there, not
> because they are better. Seems to me, that bundling is what
the anti-trust
> case was all about. So when the media were running all those
> "man-on-the-street" clips showing people saying "Microsoft
hasn't hurt
> me", well, I wonder how many of them have had all sorts of
grief from
> these vulnerabilities?
I'm not going to disagree with anything you've said but there's
another side of this that I think is being ignored.
I'm on a couple of literary listserves with a lot of people who
don't know much about computers (and a few who do) and are
always asking for help. Since nearly everyone is using OE, it's
easy to help them.
Call your ISP for support and they'll be able to help you with
OE since they're trained to help with it. It's become the
standard and, in a lot of ways, that's as important as being
good.
Why else are we using Windows?
Barry
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 17:44:01 +0200
Reply-To: Jacques Belin
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Jacques Belin
Subject: Re: Ericsson t39 - DRS-11 - 200lx
In-Reply-To: <001101c20bd4$8e0a30c0$6701a8c0@thispest>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Le Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:31:45 +0200
Etienne Lemaire a icrit:
> Is there a way to cut the ends, and connect the cables in the
> correct way?
Yes, I have done it with R320s+DRS-11. All it reduced to ~10 cm... ;-)
> I suppose I could do away with the null modem by rewiring the
> connectivity cable (there's no electronics in there AFAIK) , but
> can I link the Ericsson wires direct to the connectivity cable,
> doing away with the connectors altogether, or is there some
> circuitry in Ericsson's connector?
There are electronic parts in the Ericsson-side connector, not in the
DB9 side.
Jacques.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:57:13 -0700
Reply-To: Longden_Loo@CANDLE.COM
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Longden Loo
Subject: Personal Food Analyst question
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I'm looking for a LX-compatible food guide showing the usual calorie,
carbohydrate grams, fat grams and protein grams per serving of food items.
A dumb reference is all I need (nothing to tally or track numbers), but all
of the above information (calories, carb, fat, protein) must be there.
Is Personal Food Analyst what I'm after? Or is there some other database
or searchable reference I can download/buy?
I know I can get this on the Palm OS, but I'd rather not go that route.
Thanks.
- Longden
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:07:14 +1200
Reply-To: Tony Hutchins
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Tony Hutchins
Subject: Re: GPRS Problems
In-Reply-To: <3CFCC837.15935.1CF526B@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:03:31 +1200 (NZT)
08h02m04s ago ...
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 14:01:27 +0200, Dr. Werner Furlan wrote:
> DNS1 and DNS2 are entered in the DNS fields in WWW.
Just a guess - put ";" in front of the DNS entries in your
GPRS setup in WWW.CFG.
- Tony
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 14:00:54 -0700
Reply-To: Don Miller
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Don Miller
Organization: JFK University
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
Comments: To: Barry
In-Reply-To: <008201c20bd6$55e6ef60$1a0d22d1@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Barry wrote:
> Call your ISP for support and they'll be able to help you with OE
> since they're trained to help with it. It's become the standard and,
> in a lot of ways, that's as important as being good.
Barry - I agree with you about the value of standardization for most users
to allow good support. (We do that kind of thing at JFKU for
staff/students and as an ISP all the time). But Outlook _got to be_ the de
facto standard by being bundled, or in other words, shoved down users'
throats - not because it was a good choice. And when an ISP takes the easy
road, and just assumes Outlook/OE, then the average user thinks that is
the "right" way to go.
Standardize, yes - but with a good product chosen intelligently!
> Why else are we using Windows?
Dangerous assumption... I'm using PINE in Solaris here...
Don Miller
Network Operations
JFK University
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:56:34 -0500
Reply-To: Barry
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Barry
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
Comments: To: Don Miller
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Miller"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
> > Why else are we using Windows?
>
> Dangerous assumption... I'm using PINE in Solaris here...
Safe assumption. Most of us are using Windows.
Barry
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 00:36:23 +0200
Reply-To: Erwann ABALEA
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Erwann ABALEA
Organization: Halfling Soft
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
Comments: To: Barry
In-Reply-To: <022d01c20c12$c6e5f8a0$1a0d22d1@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Barry wrote:
> From: "Don Miller"
>
> > > Why else are we using Windows?
> >
> > Dangerous assumption... I'm using PINE in Solaris here...
>
>
> Safe assumption. Most of us are using Windows.
Well. I use Pine under Linux, and right now with a real VT420, talking
19200 bauds...
I really think that among the usual subscribers of these technical mailin=
g
lists (like HP-LX), the percentage of the people not using Windows can be
higher than for the rest of computer users...
--=20
Erwann ABALEA - RSA PGP Key ID: 0x2D0EABD5
-----
FTI: Internet est un nouveau m=E9dia. Il n'est pas encore aussi fiable,
que le t=E9l=E9phone ou la t=E9l=E9vision. Si un probl=E8me est d=E9tect=E9=
, Wanadoo
cherche toujours, =E0 le r=E9soudre dans les plus brefs d=E9lais.
-+- Wanadoo in GNU -+- Le support sans faille du FAI sans support -+-
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 20:00:10 -0400
Reply-To: Eric Greenspoon
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Eric Greenspoon
Subject: Russian on the 95LX, 200LX
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
Is it possible to type with Russian characters on the 95LX, either with
the system apps or in DOS?
Also is it possible to print or save files in Russian on the 200LX?
Thanks!
Eric
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:07:33 +0200
Reply-To: Josef Meyer
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Josef Meyer
Subject: Re: GPRS Problems
Comments: To: "Dr. Werner Furlan"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Werner,
Dr. Werner Furlan wrote:
> The dial string changed from *99# to *99***1# and the modeminit
> string changed from nothing to AT+cgdcont=1,"IP","A1.net".
> working.
I believe that in menu 'settings', 'data accounts', you have a GPRS
account with the value 'A1.net' for APN. If not, you have to add it. I
assume the rest of the account settings can remain unchanged (empty in
most cases). This is the account you have to use. Then don't put any
init-strings in the HPLX
As dial string you have to put *99***x#, whereby x refers to the CID
you see assigned to your GPRS data account in your T39m. '1' is the
default and can therefore be omitted if '1', else you have to give the
same value as in CID in the phone.
For detailed info about AT-commands of the T39m see the manual on
Daniel Hertrich's Webpage:
http://www.daniel-hertrich.de/mob-hplx/T39_DG_AT_R1A.zip
> No support from my phone company, they suggested to try a
> initstring like:
> +cgdcont=1,"IP","A1.net";+CGQREQ=1,2,4,3,3,31;+CDQMIN=1,3,4,3,1,1
>
> but it did not help.
> DNS1 and DNS2 are entered in the DNS fields in WWW.
I don't think that DNS1 / DNS2 have to have a value, normally IP, DNS1
and DNS2 are assigned by the server.
Hope this will bring you further.
Josef Meyer
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 09:26:39 +0200
Reply-To: furlan@gmx.net
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Dr. Werner Furlan"
Organization: OE9FWV
Subject: Re: GPRS Problems
Comments: To: Josef Meyer
In-Reply-To: <3CBDE9810085E635@mta9n.bluewin.ch> (added by
postmaster@bluewin.ch)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable
hallo Josef,
many thanks for your answer.
Josef Meyer schrieb =FCber Re: GPRS Problems:
> Werner,
>=20
> Dr. Werner Furlan wrote:
>=20
> > The dial string changed from *99# to *99***1# and the modeminit
> > string changed from nothing to AT+cgdcont=3D1,"IP","A1.net".
> > working.
>=20
> I believe that in menu 'settings', 'data accounts', you have a GPRS
> account with the value 'A1.net' for APN. If not, you have to add it.
> I assume the rest of the account settings can remain unchanged
> (empty in most cases). This is the account you have to use. Then
> don't put any init-strings in the HPLX
this hint was the solution of my problem. The Initstring I sent to=20
the phone had deleted the name of the APN in the phone!=20
I entered the name again, no initstring in the HP, and it works=20
again.=20
I wonder why the Initstring AT+CGDCONT=3D1,"IP","A1.net" could erase=20
the APN in the phone.
And of course the information I got from the phone company was=20
misleading in my case.
>=20
> As dial string you have to put *99***x#, whereby x refers to the CID
> you see assigned to your GPRS data account in your T39m. '1' is the
> default and can therefore be omitted if '1', else you have to give
> the same value as in CID in the phone.
that's what I did. The CID is one.
> I don't think that DNS1 / DNS2 have to have a value, normally IP,
> DNS1 and DNS2 are assigned by the server.
the phone company says it has to be filled in, but not in the=20
phone, but in the dial in program. I did not try to erase it in my=20
www setup though.
>=20
> Hope this will bring you further.
yes it did.
>=20
> Josef Meyer
thanks and best regards,
Werner=20
-- =20
PGP-Key:
SMS: <+436646340014@text.mobilkom.at>
Powered by Pegasus Mail - free at
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:32:31 +0200
Reply-To: furlan@gmx.net
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Dr. Werner Furlan"
Organization: OE9FWV
Subject: Re: GPRS Problems
Comments: To: Tony Hutchins
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable
hi Tony,=20
Tony Hutchins schrieb =FCber Re: GPRS Problems:
> Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:03:31 +1200 (NZT)
>=20
> 08h02m04s ago ...
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 14:01:27 +0200, Dr. Werner Furlan wrote:
>=20
> > DNS1 and DNS2 are entered in the DNS fields in WWW.
>=20
> Just a guess - put ";" in front of the DNS entries in your
> GPRS setup in WWW.CFG.
>=20
> - Tony
>=20
thanks for the hint, I did not try it, because it works again -=20
thanks to Joseph Meyer.=20
My phone company told me that the dial in for GPRS has changed.
They recommend *99***1# and the mentionend INIT string=20
AT+cgdcont=3D1,"IP","A1.net".
I found out that if I use this initialisation, in my phone the APN=20
entry which is A1.net was deleted!
If I use the old initialisation with *99# and AT&F, all works=20
again.
The change in the recommended Dial in was made because there are=20
two user groups now, the old group with a normal account and now=20
also the users with prepaid cards, which had no Internet access=20
before. They now have to identify from the login to which group you=20
belong to. (if I understood correctly)
Why the new dialin does not work with WWW/LX I do not understand,=20
especially why the dialin erases the APN number in my phone.
cheers,
Werner=20
-- =20
PGP-Key:
SMS: <+436646340014@text.mobilkom.at>
Powered by Pegasus Mail - free at
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 11:18:00 +0000
Reply-To: Gregory Youdin
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Gregory Youdin
Subject: Re: Russian on the 95LX, 200LX
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
> Is it possible to type with Russian characters on the 95LX, either with
>the system apps or in DOS?
>Also is it possible to print or save files in Russian on the 200LX?
>
Of course it is possible. There is program keybez. It resides on drive
D:\BIN. You need to terminate System Manager pressing "menu", A, T. When in
DOS just type:
C:\keybez ru
You can start System Manager again typing 200 (on 200LX).
Now you have Russian characters driver in memory. To swithching to Russian
characters just press CTRL. You can use it while typing or reading in DOS or
System Manager Applications. But you can't name files in Russian.
All the best,
Gregory
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 23:55:33 +1200
Reply-To: Tony Hutchins
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Tony Hutchins
Subject: Re: GPRS Problems
In-Reply-To: <3CFE04DF.28697.C1E41@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Wed, 5 Jun 2002 23:46:57 +1200 (NZT)
01h14m26s ago ...
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:32:31 +0200, Dr. Werner Furlan wrote:
> thanks for the hint, I did not try it, because it works
> again - thanks to Joseph Meyer.
Werner, Great!
> Why the new dialin does not work with WWW/LX I do not
> understand, especially why the dialin erases the APN number
> in my phone.
Have you tried it a second time, to confirm the deletion?
WWW/LX just sends the dialin - I am sure it is quite
innocent.
It sounds like your settings are now the same as they were
originally, before your GPRS provider recommended the change.
Or, is your Login different? Not important - whatever it is it
now works again :)
- Tony
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 15:09:06 +0200
Reply-To: Josef Meyer
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Josef Meyer
Subject: Re: GPRS Problems
Comments: To: furlan@gmx.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Werner,
Nice that I could help you
Dr. Werner Furlan wrote:
> > I believe that in menu 'settings', 'data accounts', you have a GPRS
> > account with the value 'A1.net' for APN. If not, you have to add it.
> > I assume the rest of the account settings can remain unchanged
> > (empty in most cases). This is the account you have to use. Then
> > don't put any init-strings in the HPLX
>
> this hint was the solution of my problem. The Initstring I sent to
> the phone had deleted the name of the APN in the phone!
> I entered the name again, no initstring in the HP, and it works
> again.
> I wonder why the Initstring AT+CGDCONT=1,"IP","A1.net" could erase
> the APN in the phone.
> And of course the information I got from the phone company was
> misleading in my case.
In the beginning of trying with GPRS and HPLX I encountered the same
thing: With the initstring AT+CGDCONT I have overwritten the original
entry, therefore I never used it again!
> > As dial string you have to put *99***x#, whereby x refers to the CID
> > you see assigned to your GPRS data account in your T39m. '1' is the
> > default and can therefore be omitted if '1', else you have to give
> > the same value as in CID in the phone.
>
> that's what I did. The CID is one.
>
> > I don't think that DNS1 / DNS2 have to have a value, normally IP,
> > DNS1 and DNS2 are assigned by the server.
>
> the phone company says it has to be filled in, but not in the
> phone, but in the dial in program. I did not try to erase it in my
> www setup though.
If IP-address, DNS1, DNS2 are not given by the APN server, indeed they
have to be set in the HPLX.
In my experience the following values have to be set:
Phone: Create a GPRS data account with the right APN value, normally
the rest is unchanged or empty (some operators require a user ID and a
password).
HPLX (or any other computer): Dial string = ATDT*99# (in case that the
CID of the GPRS account in the phone is '1', else "99"""#).
If a specific DNS has to be used, then also DNS has to be set according
to the operator's information.
I use ATZ as initstring, but most probably this can also be empty.
Regards / Josef
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 15:37:01 +0200
Reply-To: bjornn1@START.NO
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Lillebjorn Nilsen
Subject: Post/lx strip attachment
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
When I receive messages in Post/LX with several
attachments, and run "strip attachment"
- it seems that only a single one is
removed. How can I get rid of the rest?
-------------------
Lillejorn Nilsen, Oslo Norway
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 10:00:35 -0400
Reply-To: Bruce_Martin@MANULIFE.COM
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Bruce Martin
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> Safe assumption. Most of us are using Windows.
>
> Well. I use Pine under Linux, and right now with a real VT420, talking
> 19200 bauds...
>
Well indeed. I use Lotus Notes under MacOS 9.1.
> really think that among the usual subscribers of these technical mailin=
> g
> lists (like HP-LX), the percentage of the people not using Windows can be
> higher than for the rest of computer users...
>
Yes. The more you know about computers, the less you have t do with
Windows.
Bruce on a Mac in Toronto
(Virus-free since 1997. Crash-free since sometime in the Fall of 2000.)
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:58:50 -0700
Reply-To: "Daniel Ginsberg, M.D."
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Daniel Ginsberg, M.D."
Subject: Re: Personal Food Analyst question
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
You can get all the data you want on food composition from:
http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/SR14/sr14.html
It may take some work on your part to get it into your HP LX. You could
build a database or spreadsheet. I've spent a little time playing with the
data by importing it into an Access database I wrote. I'll warn you that
it's a very large database.
Daniel C Ginsberg, MD
daniel.ginsberg@multicare.org
www.allenmore.salu.net
(253) 403-4810
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:15:50 -0400
Reply-To: Eric Greenspoon
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Eric Greenspoon
Subject: Re: Russian on the 95LX, 200LX
Comments: To: Gregory Youdin
In-Reply-To:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Gregory,
Thanks for your reply. I guess I should have been a bit more specific.
On the HP95LX I haven't gotten beyond the manual, as it says that with US
machines the international characters aren't available. I hope this can be
gotten around?
With my 200LX, I have used Keybez to successfully remap the characters to
Russian. What I'm wondering now is how I can a) print the text files so
they read in Russian and b) save the files so that I can transfer them to a
desktop computer and read them in Russian there too.
Thanks!
Eric
At 11:18 AM 6/5/02 +0000, you wrote:
>> Is it possible to type with Russian characters on the 95LX, either with
>>the system apps or in DOS?
>>Also is it possible to print or save files in Russian on the 200LX?
>>
>
>Of course it is possible. There is program keybez. It resides on drive
>D:\BIN. You need to terminate System Manager pressing "menu", A, T. When in
>DOS just type:
>C:\keybez ru
>You can start System Manager again typing 200 (on 200LX).
>Now you have Russian characters driver in memory. To swithching to Russian
>characters just press CTRL. You can use it while typing or reading in DOS or
>System Manager Applications. But you can't name files in Russian.
>
>All the best,
>Gregory
>
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 13:33:50 -0700
Reply-To: Longden_Loo@CANDLE.COM
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Longden Loo
Subject: Re: Personal Food Analyst question
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> You can get all the data you want on food composition from:
>
> http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/SR14/sr14.html
>
> It may take some work on your part to get it into your HP LX. You could
> build a database or spreadsheet. I've spent a little time playing with
the
> data by importing it into an Access database I wrote. I'll warn you that
> it's a very large database.
Thanks. This is probably close to what I want (tho there's no sushi listed
).
- Longden
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:37:31 +1200
Reply-To: Tony Hutchins
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Tony Hutchins
Subject: Re: Post/lx strip attachment
In-Reply-To: <20020605133701.5EEF17E77@smtp1.powertech.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:32:04 +1200 (NZT)
08h55m03s ago ...
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 15:37:01 +0200, Lillebjorn Nilsen wrote:
> When I receive messages in Post/LX with several
> attachments, and run "strip attachment"
> - it seems that only a single one is
> removed. How can I get rid of the rest?
In general it works fine here. Occasionally I will edit (F6)
an inbox message and delete unwanted info and then re-save the
message, removing the original.
- Tony
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:04:46 -0700
Reply-To: Victor Roberts
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Victor Roberts
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 14:46:03 +0800, Adrian Ho wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 10:51:15PM -0700, Victor Roberts wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 May 2002 07:48:54 +0100, Stuart Gray
> > wrote:
> > > When will people learn that Outlook (and Express) are
> > > *really bad* email clients? [g]
> > Why do you believe that Outlook or OE are fundamentally
> > any more prone to virus attack than any other Win mailer
> > that displays HTML and _allows_ users to open attachments?
>
> It's not the feature set that's the problem, it's the
> poor /implementation/. (OK, overly-ambitious and
> barely-thought-through feature sets do contribute, too.)
Such as? I was hoping you would provide some details instead of
just restating your opinion.
>
> It's theoretically possible to have "bulletproof" MUAs with
> the same "everything-and-the-kitchen-sink" feature sets as
> Outlook/OE. It just takes much more time, effort and skill
> than Microsoft seems to be willing to dedicate to the task.
> (To be fair, few companies, if any, would score high marks
> in this respect either.)
>
> /That's/ why they're "*really bad* email clients".
> I sympathize if you have no choice but to live with them.
I never said I had to use Outlook. Also do you have any
examples of "bulletproof" MUA's that we can use to continue
this discussion with some data?
>
> > It has been my understanding that Outlook and OE are targets
> > of virus attacks _only_ because they are by far the most
> > popular mailers for Win systems.
>
> No, they're targets because their features sets are poorly
> implemented -- only an idiot or a supremely-confident cracker
> would target a "bulletproof" MUA. Their popularity merely
> makes them ideal for those who want /widespread/ havoc
> (ie. virus/worm writers).
I am disappointed. Still not data to support your position.
Just more restating the claims. You must be able to do better
than this
Vic Roberts
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:04:48 -0700
Reply-To: Victor Roberts
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Victor Roberts
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 21:21:16 -0700 (PDT), Don Miller wrote:
> Being a "big target" is only part of the problem. Outlook also has some
> unfortunate design features that virus writers often exploit, that allow
> viruses to infect computers automatically, even if the user never opens
> the attachment - messages crafted to look like "inline" objects, certain
> mime headers, etc. It tries to be more automated (and hide more from the
> user) than most e-mail programs, and the viruses exploit that.
I will agree with you only to the extent that Outlook has the
Preview view turned On by default and that Windows hides file
extensions for "known" file types by default. Other than that,
how is Outlook more prone to spreading a virus through your
system than any other Win mailer that displays HTML messages
and allows file attachments? How would these other theoretical
mailers prevent the types of viruses that you say Outlook
encourages.
> Additionally, it uses the Windows Address Book, which is particularly easy
> for viruses to exploit to get addresses. And rather than keeping its
> settings, such as defined SMTP servers, in a separate INI file, it puts
> them into the registry in a predictable place, so the virus has an easy
> time figuring out how to route its messages. Like most current MS stuff,
> it tries to pretend it's part of the operating system, not just an
> application. So I would have to agree with the message you were responding
> to, Outlook IS much worse than others...
What "Windows Address Book"? I my Outlook address book does not
have the default name and is not located in the default
directory. That is for my convenience, not to avoid viruses.
Let's say that some other mailer, let's call it SuperMail, had
80% of the market and was not a MS App and was not "integrated
into the OS like you say Outlook is. I claim that 95% of the
users of SuperMail would use the default address book name and
would leave it in the default directory. So, a virus author
would know just where to look for the address book of SuperMail
and would understand its format. Why would SuperMail's address
book be any more secure than Outlook's?
Vic Roberts
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:04:51 -0700
Reply-To: Victor Roberts
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Victor Roberts
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:36:59 +0200, "Dr. Werner Furlan" wrote:
> I am a long time user of Pegasus Mail and the programmer Mr. Harris=20
> has spent much effort to prevent the users of his program against=20
> viruses.
> It is a fact that if you execute a file containing a virus you are=20
> infected.
> The same is true with potential malignant code in Internet=20
> contents.
> It may be less comfortable to lock the door, but it makes it also=20
> less comfortable for the intruder.
>
> you have the choice....
>
> Werner
Are you saying that Pegasus will not let you open attachments
until you save them as files, or will not open your browser
using a hot link in an e-mail message? Yes, that would reduce
virus infection, at a loss of convenience which may or may not
be important, depending upon how you use your system.
By just practicing a little "safe computing" and using a virus
checker, I have never had an e-mail virus infect my various
Windows machines.
Vic Roberts
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:19:33 +0800
Reply-To: Adrian Ho
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Adrian Ho
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
In-Reply-To: ; from
RobertsV@EARTHLINK.NET on Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 07:04:46PM -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 07:04:46PM -0700, Victor Roberts wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 14:46:03 +0800, Adrian Ho wrote:
> > It's not the feature set that's the problem, it's the
> > poor /implementation/. (OK, overly-ambitious and
> > barely-thought-through feature sets do contribute, too.)
>
> Such as? I was hoping you would provide some details instead of
> just restating your opinion.
I assume you're familiar with the list of security-related
Outlook/OE bugfixes? If not, go to www.microsoft.com/security,
type "outlook security bulletin" in the Search field, and
start reading.
The Bugtraq archives @ www.securityfocus.com should also
prove interesting.
> > It's theoretically possible to have "bulletproof" MUAs with
> > the same "everything-and-the-kitchen-sink" feature sets as
> > Outlook/OE. It just takes much more time, effort and skill
> > than Microsoft seems to be willing to dedicate to the task.
> > (To be fair, few companies, if any, would score high marks
> > in this respect either.)
> >
> > /That's/ why they're "*really bad* email clients".
> > I sympathize if you have no choice but to live with them.
>
> I never said I had to use Outlook.
I never said you did. Read what I wrote again.
> Also do you have any examples of "bulletproof" MUA's that
> we can use to continue this discussion with some data?
I did say "theoretically possible", didn't I?
That said, my sis uses Pegasus Mail and has had zero problems
with viruses thus far (and I'm referring to the ones that
get past Norton AntiVirus, also running on her machine).
I don't use Windows for mail processing anymore, so I can't
comment on personal experience.
Speaking of data, where's yours?
> > > It has been my understanding that Outlook and OE are targets
> > > of virus attacks _only_ because they are by far the most
> > > popular mailers for Win systems.
> >
> > No, they're targets because their features sets are poorly
> > implemented -- only an idiot or a supremely-confident cracker
> > would target a "bulletproof" MUA. Their popularity merely
> > makes them ideal for those who want /widespread/ havoc
> > (ie. virus/worm writers).
>
> I am disappointed. Still not data to support your position.
> Just more restating the claims. You must be able to do better
> than this
I too am disappointed -- that you exhort others to do what
you would not do yourself. How about /you/ contributing some
facts to back up /your/ "understanding"?
- Adrian
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:31:36 -0500
Reply-To: John Musielewicz
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: John Musielewicz
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:04:51 -0700, you wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:36:59 +0200, "Dr. Werner Furlan" =
wrote:
>
>> I am a long time user of Pegasus Mail and the programmer Mr. =
Harris=3D20
>> has spent much effort to prevent the users of his program against=3D20
>> viruses.
>> It is a fact that if you execute a file containing a virus you =
are=3D20
>> infected.
>> The same is true with potential malignant code in Internet=3D20
>> contents.
>> It may be less comfortable to lock the door, but it makes it =
also=3D20
>> less comfortable for the intruder.
>>
>> you have the choice....
>>
>> Werner
>
>Are you saying that Pegasus will not let you open attachments
>until you save them as files, or will not open your browser
>using a hot link in an e-mail message? Yes, that would reduce
>virus infection, at a loss of convenience which may or may not
>be important, depending upon how you use your system.
Pegasus will let you do both. The single most advantage in using
Pegasus is it has an inline html viewer which does not use IE. So you
can view html messages without the fear of scripts running and loading
a virus on your system. That is the main hole in Outlook and Express.
As long as it is coupled with IE and allows scripts viruses will be
able to get in the system. The only time I've gotten a virus on my
system is when I used Outlook Express, fully patched, with AV software
with the preview window. A script was able to run and it loaded a
virus into my windows directory. Luckily I caught it before it was
able to run and deleted it. It is the only time in the last 12 years a
virus has gotten into my system. I have never had any problems with
viruses using Pegasus. I am now using Agent. It has the same
advantages as Pegasus and also handles newsgroups. Plus it has a
window which I can view email messages safely without having to click
on them to open them. It works much better than Pegasus on a 640 by
480 screen. However it uses an external html viewer for html messages
so it is only as safe as the external viwer used. I have been
bombarded with viruses for about a month or so. I tried Norton AV
first and it allowed the virus I previously mentioned on my system
even though I had it checking email. I changed to McAfee and it
hasen't picked up squat for email born viruses even though I get about
5 a day. So as far as I'm concerned I much rather use a safe email
program than trust a virus checker coupled with M$ software.
>
>By just practicing a little "safe computing" and using a virus
>checker, I have never had an e-mail virus infect my various
>Windows machines.
Are you sure? The Klez virus seems pretty prevaliant and I have never
gotten so many email born viruses as I have in the last month or so.
I've only had my earthlink mailbox for a few months so it seems very
odd that I have been getting as many virus ridden emails as I have.
Viruses seems to be infecting a heck of a lot of systems. If I was
still using Outlook or Express and a virus checker I couldn't be
completely sure I was catching all viruses without a daily manual
check of my system. I've had these problems before and its really
annoying. One time I was forced to change ISP because of the number of
email born viruses I was getting. I'm seriously considering going back
to OS/2 Warp which is extremely resistant to viruses. I used it from
95 til about 99 and was extremely happy with it. And now it runs
Windows 95 and 98 software too. I'm really dissatisfied with Windows.
Considering how prevalent viruses are for it it should have built in
safeguards to protect against them. It doesn't though and using it is
pretty much asking for trouble.
>
>Vic Roberts
John
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:26:48 -0700
Reply-To: Don Miller
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Don Miller
Organization: JFK University
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
Comments: cc: Victor Roberts
In-Reply-To: <200206060401.VAA01642@jfku.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
This is SO far off topic, I don't want to beat it to death on this list,
but some facts were requested, so here are a few:
On 05 Jun 2002, Vic Roberts wrote in reply to me:
> I will agree with you only to the extent that Outlook has the Preview
> view turned On by default and that Windows hides file extensions for
> "known" file types by default. Other than that, how is Outlook more
> prone to spreading a virus through your system than any other Win
> mailer that displays HTML messages and allows file attachments?
One very good example is Nimda, which exploits the (uniquely Outlook)
CLSID vulnerability to run silently and without being opened. Anyone
interested may see, for example:
http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32nimdaa.html
There are many others. Another example would be buffer overflow
vulnerabilities - BY NO MEANS unique to Outlook, nor to MS, but MUCH more
common there, given their "poor implementation" - i.e. sloppiness. (Also
note the IIS vulnerabilities mentioned as an aside at the page referenced
above). Just do a newsgroup search in the USENET comp.* hierarchy for
"buffer overflow" and "Outlook" or "MSIE".
And, compared to a web mail client, the comparison is even more extreme -
but, strictly speaking, that is not a "windows mailer". But it may be a
very good idea...
> What "Windows Address Book"? I my Outlook address book does not have
> the default name and is not located in the default directory. That is
> for my convenience, not to avoid viruses.
But you can bet that there is a pointer to it, wherever you put it, and
whatever you called it, in the registry at a known or determinable
location. That is part of what I meant about "pretending to be" part of
the O/S. They _intend_ it to be "open", they regard it as a feature. And
it is repeatedly a vulnerability. Yes, when these are exploited, MS will
(sometimes) post a patch. Often slowly and grudgingly. And always after
the problem is huge.
Taking into account all the _evidence_, which is way beyond the scope of
what belongs on the HP-LX list, my reasoned opinion is that Outlook (in
any variation) may be assumed to be risky, and should not be used. Others
may differ.
Regards,
Don Miller
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 05:45:25 +0000
Reply-To: Gregory Youdin
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Gregory Youdin
Subject: Re: Russian on the 95LX, 200LX
Comments: To: ericgree@enoreo.on.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Hello Eric,
I'm not familiar with HP95LX, but I guess there shouldn't be a problem
remapping their keyboard as well using keybez. I would also recommend trying
any other remappers like keyrus.com or alfa.com they are small and should
work.
Saving a files. You can try this experiment:
1. load keybez
2. c:\copy con rustest.txt
3. press ctrl
4. type something like "PROWERKA RUSSKIH KLAWI["
5. press ctrl and enter
6. press ctrl+z, then enter
7. and you can verify the file with c:\type rustest.txt
Printing this text shouldn't be a problem if you have extended char table in
your printer... BTW, some dot printers have specific DIP switch settings for
that. If not, you might want to find some proggy which might do it. As far
as I remember, there was one named printfx...
I have o-o-old archives, so I might try and dig'em out...
Have fun! :-)
Gregory
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 19:04:28 +0200
Reply-To: Clemens Dubslaff
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Clemens Dubslaff
Organization: http://freemail.web.de/
Subject: OGO: Batterystate
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi!
I'm using an Ogo100 and want to include a "batterystatewatcher" in my prog=
. Does anybody have some information how I can do this=3F It only have to sh=
ow how much power the battery has. Thanks!
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
Greetings/MFG
from=A0Cle.Du=A0cu
=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF
Die=A0Mathematik=A0ist=A0ein=A0Spielzeug,=A0welches=A0die=A0Natur=A0uns=A0zuwarf,=A0um=A0uns=A0in=A0=
diesem=A0Jammertal=A0zu=A0tr=F6sten=A0und=A0zu=A0unterhalten.
(Le=A0Rond=A0d'Alembert)
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F
FreeMail in der Premiumversion! Mit mehr Speicher, mehr Leistung, mehr=20
Erlebnis und mehr Pr=E4mie. Jetzt unter http://club.web.de/=3Fmc=3D021105
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 20:47:02 +0100
Reply-To: Chris Randle
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Chris Randle
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HPLX Mailing List [mailto:HPLX-L@UConnVM.UConn.Edu] On
> Behalf Of Victor Roberts
> Sent: 06 June 2002 03:05
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 14:46:03 +0800, Adrian Ho wrote:
> > It's not the feature set that's the problem, it's the
> > poor /implementation/. (OK, overly-ambitious and
> > barely-thought-through feature sets do contribute, too.)
> and Victor Roberts replied:
> Such as? I was hoping you would provide some details instead
> of just restating your opinion.
I'll chip in if you don't mind? Some things I hate:
1) Hit reply. Everything set up for top posting. It's extra work to get
it all moved about for bottom posting.
2) Reply to an HTML post and you get HTML, even though your settings are
for text e-mail only. Go to Format->Plain Text and it dutifully converts
it to text, but loses the quoting marks, so you either give in and post
HTML or else have to add loads of ">" symbols everywhere.
3) Signatures are anything you like. There's no clue anywhere that a
proper sig should begin "-- ".
4) Rules for message moving based on content/subject etc. have a mind of
their own. It has a junk e-mail folder that it sends some mail to
despite the fact there's no rule for it. Some HPLX stuff gets sent
there. It's an internal thing, there's no configuration for it. Someone
suggested to me that it might be based on the senders server being
black-listed, but even if it is, there's no way to override it.
Sometimes the mail is copied there, sometimes moved so you can't just go
in there and delete it because it might be the only copy.
5) Every default setting seems designed to lead people into "bad" habits
like HTML & top posting. I always have the feeling that the people that
wrote it never even heard of RFC's, let alone read any. They're too used
to making the rules to suddenly start following any.
6) Generally speaking, it has the feeling that it's full of gee-whizz
features bunged willy-nilly wherever anybody felt like it, without any
underlying purity of design. It's a leviathan that ends up getting in
your way constantly.
7) It's files are HUGE. I used to do all my e-mail on an 8MB 200LX with
a 48MB CF card. About 2MB on LX and 5MB on the card was my e-mail bits &
pieces and address book, diary etc. My outlook data file is currently
44MB. In exchange for this six-fold increase, I would be hard pressed to
name any functionality I now have that I lacked before.
I only use Outlook (full 2002 version) because it synchronises with my
Jornada. Before that I was using Post/LX on the 200. I have to say that
despite its miniscule size, it (Post/LX) is one of the most (useful)
feature packed and nicest-to-use e-mail clients I've tried. I miss it.
Liking or disliking a product is sometimes a hard-to-define feeling. I
must say that having used other mailers (Post/LX, Pegasus, Turnpike,
Pine, Psion 5) there's something really horrid about Outlook that's hard
to put your finger on (quite apart from the niggles listed above). Try
this analogy: after reading a few books, some stand out as classics, in
content and style. Outlook then reminds me of a comic; it's got some fun
moments but it is hard to treat it as a serious, professional product.
Please don't take this as an attack on your opinions in any way. It's
hard when something you like gets knocked, and if it you like it, then
that's great. I must like it a bit, because I'm using it at the moment,
but it does have some really questionable "features".
--
Chris Randle
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 23:22:35 +0100
Reply-To: Chris Randle
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Chris Randle
Subject: Re: And more Lotus questions (for lxgluc)
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HPLX Mailing List [mailto:HPLX-L@UConnVM.UConn.Edu] On
> Behalf Of Daniel Hertrich
> Sent: 28 May 2002 15:38
>
> >On Tue, 28 May 2002 11:05:31 +0100, Yves Leurquin
> > wrote:
>
> > {HOME}{Right}{END}{DOWN}{DOWN} would do what you want
> > provided that the list is contiguous.
>
> Thanks.
> This was the first thing I tried, but in the beginning, the
> list is empty, and then it takes me to row 8192. :-) And
> since there are others who are interested in using this
> spreadsheet I want to make it work consistently, no matter if
> it already contains data or not.
Bit late now, probably, but what about:
{HOME}{R}{IF @COUNT(B1..B8192)>0}{END}{D}{D}
That way it only goes to the end of the list if there's something in the
list.
--
Chris Randle
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 03:58:59 +0000
Reply-To: fjkaufman@WORLDNET.ATT.NET
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "F. Kaufman"
Subject: Re: Personal Food Analyst question
Comments: To: Longden_Loo@CANDLE.COM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> Thanks. This is probably close to what I want (tho there's no sushi listed
> ).
Hey, if you find data, let some of us know (G)
Maybe it depends on the generousity of the chef's slices (G)
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 11:16:58 +0200
Reply-To: Daniel Hertrich
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Daniel Hertrich
Subject: Re: And more Lotus questions (for lxgluc)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Chris
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 23:22:35 +0100, Chris Randle =
wrote:
> Bit late now, probably, but what about:
> {HOME}{R}{IF @COUNT(B1..B8192)>0}{END}{D}{D}
> That way it only goes to the end of the list if there's something in =
the
> list.
hey, great! Thanks! That could be exactly what I need. I'll keep it in
mind (or better: in a mind map ;-) ) and use it for the next version of
LXGLUC.
Thanks!
daniel
--
http://www.daniel-hertrich.de/contact
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 13:52:29 +0200
Reply-To: Daniel Hertrich
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Daniel Hertrich
Subject: Special characters in mail headers of Post/LX
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi friends,
I have made a batch file called from peh.bat after saving the body of a
created message in post/lx, which converts all German special
characters to ASCII-equivalents, to avoid problems if someone who canno
decide MIME reads my mails (=F6 -> oe etc).
However, this only converts the message body contents, not the header.
I have seen that the header is also opened as post.hed, but there the
uplauts are already encoded somehow. Here is an example for the
encoding of the =FC in the header:
Mehr Formel-Erzeugung =3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=3DFCr_Internet...?=3D
So my batch file cannot convert that to "ue".
Does anyone know how to avoid this ISO encoding?
Is this also MIME encoding? Why is the header handled seperately from
the body? If I switch off MIME in Post/LX (Alt-I), the umlauts in the
header are still encoded that way.
Also: I often get mails, in which Post/LX shows the header data as
pasted above, i.e. it doesn't decode the umlauts. Does anyone know the
reason? Seems to be only sometimes, not always. And only in the
header.
Another approach for the header could be a Post/LX macro, I thought,
but these macros don't work for some reason
(=FC, =F6, =E4):
#1681=3D#1675#1265
#1894=3D#186f#1265
#1e84=3D#1e61#1265
Does anyone have an idea why? They don't simply have any effect.
Thanks
daniel
--
http://www.daniel-hertrich.de/contact
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 08:45:42 -0600
Reply-To: hplx@sirveiss.com
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Jeff V
Subject: Memory question
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Hi all,
I was recently playing with emm200 on my 200lx 2x 6M & 200lx 2x 2M but
couldn't get it to work on either. On the 6M, CHKDSK EMM200.DAT kept
telling me the file was non-contiguous and on the 2M, CHKDSK would tell
me it was contiguous but the driver at boottime would tell me it's not.
I'm actually trying to find something I can use to run lots of EXM
programs at once (I keep running out of memory). Everything I've read
about Software Carousel says it allows you to run multiple DOS programs
but no mention of EXM programs.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
-Jeff
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:44:16 +0200
Reply-To: bjornn1@START.NO
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Lillebjorn Nilsen
Subject: Re: Post/lx strip attachment
Comments: To: hplxmail@alwaysafe.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks, Avi. The "brute force" metod works
fine!
Lillebjorn (Polar Bear?)
On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 00:29:13 -0700, hplxmail@alwaysafe.com wrote:
> Hi Nordic Bear:
>
> My multiple attachment emails work fine. I tried a few using Edora,
> Mail2web.com client, Yahoo.com and post/LX.
>
> I am guessing now: It is possible that your correspondent uses an email
> package which makes its own rules how to attach, and consequently =
Post/LX
> hasn't got a chance. I have seen this happen with Outlook Express and
> Outlook. MS is large enough to make their own rules (?) and consequently=
> things can awry when other email packages try to work with it. I
> occasionally have troubles seeing in Eudora any attachments made by =
Outlock
> Express, for example.
>
> In any case: you can use a bit of brute force to get rid of attachments
> like this:
>
> Close down POST/LX. Use PE or some other capable text editor that can =
see
> the XXXX.I file where the attachments are. MEMO is too lame!
-------------------
Lillebjorn Nilsen, Oslo Norway
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:31:53 +0200
Reply-To: Gijs Leegwater
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Gijs Leegwater
Subject: extra storage
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
I have some questions about memory PC-cards. I have now a 200lx 2mb with
512K HPF1003A SRAM card. But i want some more memory, something like 32 MB.
Would it be good to sell the SRAM card and buy a 32MB ATA Flash PC-Card? Do
those cards work on the 200lx?
And another thing: is it possible to use modem in the 200lx and connect it
to my nokia 3310 to dial up? What kind of cable do i need for that? What is
the highest speed i could get with that?
Bye,
Cheiz
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:45:20 +0200
Reply-To: Erwann ABALEA
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Erwann ABALEA
Organization: Halfling Soft
Subject: Re: extra storage
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Gijs Leegwater wrote:
> I have some questions about memory PC-cards. I have now a 200lx 2mb wit=
h
> 512K HPF1003A SRAM card. But i want some more memory, something like 32=
MB.
> Would it be good to sell the SRAM card and buy a 32MB ATA Flash PC-Card=
? Do
> those cards work on the 200lx?
Yes, they will. Buy a good one to avoid problems (SanDisk, Dane-Elec,
Kodak, ...)
> And another thing: is it possible to use modem in the 200lx and connect=
it
> to my nokia 3310 to dial up? What kind of cable do i need for that? Wha=
t is
> the highest speed i could get with that?
From the Nokia site, the 3310 doesn't have any modem in it. It *may* be
possible to surf with the 3310, but only with a 'soft-modem'. I don't kno=
w
of any soft-modem software for DOS. If such software for the 6150 existed=
,
I'd be really interested... until I change my GSM. ;)
--=20
Erwann ABALEA - RSA PGP Key ID: 0x2D0EABD5
-----
Ce ne sont que des propositions. Je ne veux pas les faire passer en
force. Je pense que si mes id=E9es doivent =EAtre reprises, elles ne
doivent pas passer au vote, pour plusieurs raison :
-+- BC in : http://neuneu.ctw.cc - Neuneu sans vote et sans forcer -+-
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 12:49:03 -0400
Reply-To: Bruce_Martin@MANULIFE.COM
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Bruce Martin
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Possible Virus
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Other than that, how is Outlook more
> prone to spreading a virus through your system than any other Win
> mailer that displays HTML messages and allows file attachments?
>
The list of holes in Outlook is as long as the list of viruses, worms and
trojans that have been created to exploit them. And *that* list is a matter
of public record.
Is Outlook bad because of sloppy programming? Probably not. My opinion is
that Outlook is bad because of *arrogant* programming.
Microsoft believes that it knows better than the user how the program
should be used. And so Microsoft created Outlook with thousands of hidden
trapdoors, hooks and resources which can be used by Windows, Internet
Explorer, and any other Microsoft applications, without the consent (or
even the knowledge) of the user. It's these trapdoors that virus writers
exploit again and again.
Granted, part of the problem is that Microsoft is virtually a monopoly. So
if a programmer wants to cause the most trouble, they'll target a Microsoft
product. But does Microsoft have to make it so easy for them?
I guess the solution is either:
A) Force MS to create applications that do only what the user wants, not
what MS wants.
B) Stop MS's monopoly.
Bruce in Toronto
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 19:38:40 +0200
Reply-To: Gijs Leegwater
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Gijs Leegwater
Subject: philips velo 500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
I saw philips velo 500 on a site for not so many euros. Does someone has
experience with this thing? Better than 200lx?
-Cheiz
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 11:27:51 +1200
Reply-To: Tony Hutchins
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Tony Hutchins
Subject: Re: Special characters in mail headers of Post/LX
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sat, 8 Jun 2002 10:50:24 +1200 (NZT)
10h57m55s ago ...
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 13:52:29 +0200, Daniel Hertrich wrote:
> Mehr Formel-Erzeugung =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=FCr_Internet...?=
>
> So my batch file cannot convert that to "ue".
> Does anyone know how to avoid this ISO encoding?
Daniel, AFAIK the headers are always 7 bit. ISO is a way of
encoding 8 bit characters in 7 bit characters.
> Is this also MIME encoding?
Yes the "=FC" is effectively MIME encoded "quoted printable"
with charset=ISO-8859-1
> Why is the header handled seperately from the body?
Good question - the MIME encoding headers refer to the
"content" of the message, or it's body, which can be 8-bit or
7-bit.
The headers themselves can only be 7-bit apparently (I don't
know why this is - probably historical reasons are behind it).
So, any encoding *in* the headers has to be somehow embedded
in them and the ?ISO and ?Q .. must be a standard that evolved
for this.
> If I switch off MIME in Post/LX (Alt-I), the umlauts in the
> header are still encoded that way.
Yup, MIME just refers to the body.
> Also: I often get mails, in which Post/LX shows the header data as
> pasted above, i.e. it doesn't decode the umlauts. Does anyone know the
> reason? Seems to be only sometimes, not always. And only in the
> header.
I have seen this rarely. I always find it interesting -
usually an unusual mail client is used - and the formatting is
shall we say "non-standard". POST/LX is not endowed with
sufficient AI to make a best guess of what the client
intended.
> Another approach for the header could be a Post/LX macro, I thought,
> but these macros don't work for some reason
> (|, v, d):
> #1681=#1675#1265
> #1894=#186f#1265
> #1e84=#1e61#1265
>
> Does anyone have an idea why? They don't simply have any effect.
Sorry I don't know why.
It's hard to modify a header in POST/LX, other than manually.
PEH.SCR does decode that ?ISO stuff, using SR.EXE and a table
(So the From: name appears nicely in the topline). And, if I
come across a non-standard encoding I usually modify the
script a little, just for fun :)
ROBOWEB/LX does the same, using tables provided - it does
encoding/decoding if necessary, to make the "From:" headers
display nicely for the articles received in the inbox. BTW I
just uploaded a new roboweb.zip to
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/th/
which has a new RWEB.O (the file of sample digs). This was
needed because Yahoo changed their wireless news to an .XML
scheme. Also I found the elusive NY Times "omnisky" pages.
Plus I added a "Slashdot" dig. And "the Onion" and a couple of
others.
- Tony
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 05:52:31 +0200
Reply-To: Nathalie Bugeaud
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Nathalie Bugeaud
Subject: for SED users
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
plse advise:
Which SYNOPSIS sed [-n] [-g] [-e script] [-f sfilename] [filename ] do i use
to remove spaces before and after paragraph markers (aka hard returns)?
Dr.Nat
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:32:26 +1200
Reply-To: Tony Hutchins
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Tony Hutchins
Subject: Re: for SED users
Comments: To: Nathalie Bugeaud
In-Reply-To: <007c01c20ea0$e3d15be0$4d5a933e@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:17:43 +1200 (NZT)
Dear Dr Nat. :)
This is just a total guess. I am not sure what you mean by
deleting spaces after a hard return.
Maybe one or both of these sed scripts will do what you want:
# flushes spaces tabs
s/^[ \t]*//
# deletes consecutive lines with whitespace
/[^ \t]/,/^[ \t]*$/!d
The above are in a file called RWSEDTX1.TXT which is part of
ROBOWEB/LX.
sed.exe -f rwsedtx1.txt file1.txt > file2.txt
takes file1.txt and makes file2.txt.
file2.txt will never have 2 consecutuve blank lines, and also
every line of text will be flush left.
So a file1.txt like:
Hello Dr. Nat
Can you give us an example file?
.. and show us what you want
the output to be.
becomes:
Hello Dr. Nat
Can you give us an example file?
.. and show us what you want
the output to be.
HTH,
- Tony
-----
01h25m12s ago ...
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 05:52:31 +0200, Nathalie Bugeaud wrote:
> plse advise:
> Which SYNOPSIS sed [-n] [-g] [-e script] [-f sfilename]
> [filename ] do i use to remove spaces before and after
> paragraph markers (aka hard returns)?
>
> Dr.Nat
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 13:21:06 +0200
Reply-To: "Helmuth E. Guenther"
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Helmuth E. Guenther"
Subject: O2-DE GPRS
Comments: To: dabeta@dasoft.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Service provider: O2-DE
I use GPRS connected to a Nokia 6310 via IrDA. This is my GPRS section in =
the
www.cfg:
[GPRS_O2]
Port=3D-1
OmniGo=3D0
PPP=3D1
Modem=3D1
Baud=3D38400
My_IP=3D
DNS_IP=3D195.182.096.028
DNS2_IP=3D195.182.096.061
Script=3DCHAP_Script
Login=3D
Dial=3D*99#
Password=3D
ModemInit=3DAT&F+CGDCONT=3D1,"IP", "internet"
Magic=3D0
Compress=3D0
There is no Login=3D and no Password=3D required.
Kind regards
Helmuth
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 14:09:50 +0200
Reply-To: Erwann ABALEA
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Erwann ABALEA
Organization: Halfling Soft
Subject: Re: for SED users
In-Reply-To: <007c01c20ea0$e3d15be0$4d5a933e@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Nathalie Bugeaud wrote:
> plse advise:
> Which SYNOPSIS sed [-n] [-g] [-e script] [-f sfilename] [filename ] do =
i use
> to remove spaces before and after paragraph markers (aka hard returns)?
Since sed only deals with classic text files, maybe you could define what
a paragraph marker is, and what a 'hard return' is. One you defined this,
some regexps can be easily given.
--=20
Erwann ABALEA - RSA PGP Key ID: 0x2D0EABD5
-----
NT n'a pas pu initialiser le fichier de partage de la partition de
d=E9marrage pour le vidage sur incident. Ceci est peut-=EAtre d=FB au fai=
t
que le syst=E8me ne dispose plus que de 3,8 Go de m=E9moire physique.
-+- Windows NT in GNU : Giga ou giga pas ? Si c'est comme =E7a, je me cra=
she.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 15:24:15 +0200
Reply-To: Ulrich.Allen@GMX.De
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Uli Allen | | | | | | | | | | |